March 7, 2023 0 comment

How to Manage the Third-Party Supply Chain Risks Effectively

Third-Party Risk Management

Third-party risk management (TPRM) refers to the process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with the use of third-party vendors or suppliers in a company’s supply chain. These third-party vendors may introduce various types of risks to the company, such as operational, financial, legal, reputational, or cybersecurity risks. This is particularly important in the context of supply chain management because companies often rely on multiple vendors and suppliers to produce and distribute their products or services. Effective third-party risk management involves implementing policies and procedures to ensure that these risks are identified and addressed before they can cause harm to the company. This may include conducting due diligence on potential vendors, monitoring vendor performance and compliance with contractual obligations, implementing security controls to protect against cyber threats, and establishing contingency plans to minimize the impact of any disruptions in the supply chain. Thus, by managing third-party risks effectively, companies can help to ensure the resilience and sustainability of their supply chains, protect their brand reputation, and maintain the trust of their customers and stakeholders.

Risks Encountered during TPRM

Risks such as Cyber & Digital, Compliance & Regulatory, and Financial Crime can manifest in third-party supply chains in several ways. Here are some examples:

Cyber & Digital Risks – Third-party vendors can introduce vulnerabilities in a company’s systems and networks, leading to cyber-attacks and data breaches. For instance, a supplier may use outdated software or hardware that is no longer supported by the manufacturer, making it easier for hackers to exploit vulnerabilities. Third-party vendors may also use weak passwords, which can be easily hacked by cybercriminals.

Compliance & Regulatory Risks – Third-party suppliers may not comply with regulatory requirements, such as environmental or labour laws, exposing a company to reputational damage and legal liability. For example, a company may contract with a supplier that engages in unethical labour practices or uses materials that are banned in certain countries.

Financial Crime Risks – Third-party vendors may engage in fraudulent activities, such as bribery, corruption, or money laundering, which can impact a company’s financial health and reputation. For example, a supplier may pay bribes to secure contracts, or may launder money through their business operations.

To mitigate these risks, companies need to conduct due diligence on their third-party vendors, including evaluating their cybersecurity practices, regulatory compliance, and financial stability. Companies should also have clear contracts with their suppliers that outline expectations around risk management and compliance, and establish processes for monitoring and auditing third-party activity.

Managing Third-party Supply Chain Risks

Managing third-party and supply chain risks can be challenging due to various factors, including operational, strategic, and cultural factors. Here are some of the challenges that organizations may face when managing third-party and supply chain risks:

Operational challenges – These challenges are related to the day-to-day management of third-party relationships and include issues such as poor communication, inadequate oversight, and lack of visibility into the supplier’s operations. These issues can lead to delivery delays, quality problems, and compliance violations.

Strategic challenges – These challenges are related to the alignment of the supplier’s goals with the organization’s objectives. For example, a supplier may be focused on cost reduction, while the organization is focused on quality or sustainability. These misaligned goals can lead to conflicts and undermine the effectiveness of the partnership.

Cultural challenges – These challenges are related to the differences in cultural norms and values between the organization and its suppliers. For example, a supplier may have different ethical standards or may not share the same commitment to social responsibility as the organization. These cultural differences can create challenges in communication, trust, and collaboration.

Regulatory challenges – Third-party and supply chain risks are subject to regulatory compliance, which can be complex and time-consuming to manage. Compliance requirements vary by industry and country, and failure to comply can result in legal and reputational risks.

Financial challenges – Managing third-party and supply chain risks can be expensive, as it often involves investing in tools, technology, and resources. The costs of managing risks can also increase if a supplier experiences financial distress or bankruptcy.

Managing third-party and supply chain risks requires a proactive and strategic approach that addresses operational, strategic, cultural, regulatory, and financial challenges. Organizations should establish clear policies, procedures, and performance metrics to manage risk and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. They should also invest in tools and technology to enhance visibility and communication with suppliers and mitigate risks.

Digitisation of Supply Chains

The digitisation of supply chains by third-party vendors presents both risks and opportunities for businesses. Here are some of the key ones:

Opportunities

Improved efficiency – Digitisation can automate many processes in the supply chain, leading to increased speed and accuracy, and reduced costs.
Better visibility – By digitising the supply chain, businesses can gain real-time visibility into the status of their products and inventory, helping them make better decisions and respond quickly to changes in demand.
Enhanced collaboration – Digitisation can help businesses collaborate more effectively with their suppliers, customers, and logistics partners, resulting in better coordination and faster problem-solving.
Increased customer satisfaction – Digitisation can help businesses improve their delivery times and provide better customer service, which can lead to increased customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Competitive advantage – By adopting digital supply chain technology, businesses can gain a competitive advantage over rivals who have not yet embraced digitisation.

Risks

Cybersecurity – Digitisation introduces new risks related to cybersecurity and data privacy. Third-party vendors may not have the same level of security measures in place, leading to potential data breaches and other security incidents.
Dependence on technology – Relying heavily on digital technology can create a single point of failure, making businesses vulnerable to disruption if there is a technology failure or outage.
Complexity – The complexity of digital supply chains can make them more difficult to manage, leading to potential delays and disruptions.
Limited control – By outsourcing supply chain functions to third-party vendors, businesses may lose some control over their supply chain processes, making it harder to respond quickly to changes in demand or address issues that arise.
Cost – Digitisation can be expensive, and businesses may need to invest in new technology and training to fully realise the benefits of a digital supply chain. Thus, the digitisation of supply chains presents significant opportunities for businesses to improve their efficiency, visibility, and customer satisfaction. However, businesses must be aware of the potential risks and take steps to manage them effectively.

ESG and its impact on Third Party Supply Chains

When it comes to third-party supply chains, ESG considerations are particularly relevant. Many companies rely on third-party suppliers to provide raw materials, goods, and services, and these suppliers can have a significant impact on a company’s overall ESG performance.

For example, a company may be committed to reducing its carbon footprint, but if its suppliers are not doing the same, it can undermine the company’s overall efforts. Similarly, if a company is committed to human rights and labour standards, but its suppliers are engaging in practices that violate these standards, it can damage the company’s reputation and brand.
As a result, many companies are now looking to incorporate ESG considerations into their third-party supplier selection and management processes. This can include evaluating suppliers based on their ESG performance, setting ESG standards that suppliers must meet, and monitoring supplier performance to ensure that they are meeting these standards.
By taking a proactive approach to ESG and third-party supply chains, companies can not only mitigate risks and protect their reputation but also drive positive change throughout their supply chain and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable future.

Third-Party Risk Framework

Designing a third-party supply chain risk framework involves identifying and evaluating potential risks associated with outsourcing to third-party vendors. Here are some steps to design a third-party supply chain risk framework:

Start by identifying all third-party vendors and categorizing them based on the nature of their services, their geographic location, the level of access they have to sensitive data, and the importance of their services to the organization.
Conduct a risk assessment of each third-party vendor to identify potential risks associated with outsourcing to them. The risks may include financial, legal, operational, reputational, and compliance risks.
Define the organization’s risk appetite by setting acceptable levels of risk for each category of vendors based on their importance to the organization and the potential impact of their services on the business.
Develop risk management strategies that align with the organization’s risk appetite for each category of vendors. The strategies may include risk avoidance, risk mitigation, risk transfer, and risk acceptance.
Regularly monitor and review the third-party vendors to ensure that they comply with the defined risk management strategies and that the risks are managed effectively. This should include periodic audits, performance reviews, and ongoing communication with the vendors.
Continuously improve the framework by updating the risk assessment and management strategies based on the changing risk landscape and the organization’s risk appetite.
Establish effective communication channels with the vendors to ensure that they understand the risks and the organization’s expectations. This should include clear and concise contract language, regular performance evaluations, and a robust reporting process.

Third-Party Risk Governance

Third-party risk governance in the supply chain should include the following things:

Conducting a risk assessment to identify and evaluate potential risks associated with third-party vendors or suppliers.
Performing due diligence on third-party vendors or suppliers to ensure they meet the organization’s standards for ethics, compliance, and quality.
Establishing contractual agreements with third-party vendors or suppliers that include provisions for risk mitigation, liability, confidentiality, and data security.
Monitoring the performance and compliance of third-party vendors or suppliers on an ongoing basis and reporting any issues or concerns to senior management.
Developing an incident response plan to address any disruptions or breaches caused by third-party vendors or suppliers.
Continuously improving the third-party risk management program by incorporating lessons learned from previous incidents, updating policies and procedures, and leveraging new technologies.
Collaborating with stakeholders across the organization, including procurement, legal, compliance, and IT, to ensure a coordinated and effective approach to third-party risk management.

Assessing third-party risks and controls – process requirements, tools and techniques

Assessing third-party risks and controls involves a structured and comprehensive approach to evaluate the potential risks associated with engaging with external parties. Here are some recommended tools, processes, and techniques to consider:

Implement a risk assessment framework that can provide a systematic way to identify, assess, and prioritize third-party risks. The framework should include criteria for identifying potential risks, such as vendor criticality, regulatory compliance requirements, and data protection obligations.
Use due diligence questionnaires to gather information about third-party vendors’ security practices, policies, and procedures. These questionnaires should be tailored to the type of vendor and risk involved.
Review contracts with third-party vendors to ensure they include adequate provisions for risk management, such as data protection, confidentiality, and liability.
Conduct onsite audits to evaluate third-party vendor compliance with security standards, policies, and procedures.
Conduct penetration testing on third-party vendors’ systems to identify potential vulnerabilities and security weaknesses.
Implement a continuous monitoring program to track third-party vendors’ security practices, policies, and procedures.
Develop incident response plans with third-party vendors to ensure they are prepared to respond to security incidents.
Monitor third-party vendors’ compliance with regulatory and contractual requirements, such as data protection laws and security standards.
Develop reporting mechanisms to track and report on third-party vendor risks to senior management and the board of directors.
Implement vendor management software to automate and streamline the vendor risk assessment process.

It is essential to have a comprehensive and ongoing TPRM program in place to effectively manage third-party risks and controls. By leveraging the above tools and techniques, organizations can better assess and manage the risks associated with engaging with external parties. Having a robust TPRM program is essential for any organization that relies on third-party vendors or suppliers. The TPRM program should cover all aspects of the procurement lifecycle, from onboarding to exit. Here are some suggested practices to follow:

Develop a comprehensive understanding of the risks associated with each third-party vendor or supplier. This includes conducting due diligence checks, reviewing contracts and agreements, and assessing the vendor’s security and compliance posture.
After conducting the risk assessment, categorize vendors based on their risk level. High-risk vendors may require more rigorous due diligence and monitoring than lower-risk vendors.
Implement controls and procedures to mitigate identified risks. These controls may include contract clauses, service-level agreements, and periodic vendor assessments.
Regularly monitor vendor performance to ensure compliance with established controls and procedures. This may include periodic audits, ongoing monitoring of vendor activities, and review of security and compliance certifications.
Establish procedures to respond to incidents or issues that arise with vendors. This may include incident response plans, escalation procedures, and vendor termination or remediation procedures.
Regularly review the TPRM program to identify areas for improvement. This may include updating risk assessments, enhancing controls and procedures, and improving monitoring and reporting processes.

Conclusion

Incorporating the above practices into the procurement lifecycle will help ensure that third-party vendors and suppliers are properly vetted and managed, reducing the risk of security breaches, compliance violations, and other issues. On the contrary, if a third party in a supply chain has a better framework than the principal employer, it may create some challenges for the employer. Firstly, it may result in a competitive advantage for the third party, as they are better equipped to meet customer demands and offer higher quality products or services. This could lead to the employer losing business to the third party, which could impact their revenue and market share. Secondly, it may highlight areas where the employer needs to improve their processes and systems to remain competitive. The employer may need to invest in new technology, training or processes to match the standards of the third party. However, it is also possible that the third party may be able to offer their framework as a service to the employer. In this case, the employer can leverage the expertise of the third party to improve their own framework, while also maintaining control over their supply chain. Ultimately, it is important for the employer to continuously evaluate their own framework and look for ways to improve it. This can help them remain competitive in the market and meet the evolving needs of their customers.

References:

Post Views: 655

How to Manage the Third-Party Supply Chain Risks Effectively

Comments are closed

Want to subscribe job alerts?